ABOUT THE SEMANTIC IMPURITY

Semantic impurity is every use of language that reflects fundamentally the subject, not the object. It is an apparently clear and uniform meaning that hides in its apparent evidence a variety of meanings. Semantic impurity is not only the vagueness of the meaning but also any idea, notion, feeling or experience that prevent from contemplating clearly the facts. Semantic... impurity is the primacy of the subjectivity on the objective vision. Some intellectuals say that the language is mythology. It is not true. Poetic, colloquial, language is mainly mythology. Language is wider and richer than they believe. Language is the voice of the being and the being is reason, is emotion, communication and lack of communication: the most important evolutionary skill to know and feel the reality. Other intellectuals affirm that the language can never be directly objective, but nothing in the psychology of the man is directly objective. That one does not mean that the language cannot be objective, because the objectivity is an adaptative construction, a creative adjustment of his psyche to the requirements of the world, included his own reality.

 

 

 

WHY AM I WHAT I AM?

I could have been a Casanova, a taster of avid and lecherous skins, a devout of bare and fugitive pleasure. I could have exalted the sex in my heart and have made that my testicles impelled my thoughts, but it was my vanity and my fear of death what made me be a thinker, an artist, a Don Juan in eternal linguistic adventure.

DEVOUT LOVER

Without you, woman, without your marvelous receptiveness, without that indomitable fragance that is released from every point of your skin, without the fire that flames on your maternal entrails, oh, what would be of me, complement to my being.

INSANE THOUGHTS

The macabre flowers that perfum this bloodthirsthy heart are made of your warm and salty presence. Your blood on my hands is not dead, but life: the survival of the fittest in the implacable world of the society.

WHAT REVOLUTION NEEDS

If we want to change society we must understand that oppressor and oppressed must be transformed. If the oppressed comes to power to become a new oppressor, then the the revolution is meaningless. For this reason, the revolution must be led by social scientists, this is people with a deep political , economic and psychosocial knowledge. Our task as individuals is to work constantly to find out what part of our activity and mentality contributed to the alienation and the maintenance of the system. Just so we know we can contribute significantly to change

WHAT IS GOD?


1.  God is not gratitude, love or compassion. These are just projections of desires, human attempts to escape from finitude. When we say that God is love, God is wisdom, that He is infinitely humble and powerful, we only projected on God a part of our interior, the aspect considered good and desirable. This means that one is impoverishing him, restricting him because God is everything, a hole that is something but not someone.  Therefore, God is not a being, but a context. The context in which all beings, facts and relationships are what they are and what they will become.

2.  God is the universal set, the infinite structure in wich finite beings operate. We are only one element, which is at once a set, an unitary set, perhaps an empty one. If we were not, the structure would remain infinite, not as beautiful as it is, but infinite.

PRESENT AND FUTURE

What I am is due to others, what I will be is in spite of others. My individuality comes from society, but I must trascend it to give birth to the universal. I am an individual because I am full of society. When I starts to kill the society, the agony of the individual will begin. In that moment Dyonisus will be my God, I myself will be Dyonisus.

ABOUT THE BELIEVER'S  DOUBT

People who believe and accept the doubt they doubt to believe more, surrender themselves to possess better, desire to be object of desire. Who believes doesn´t search for the truth, really. His search is so tendentious, so plenty of ego, of eager confirmation: the believer is not an authentic seacher.